Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-20 03:33:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 84B931EC304C8DF3E5A4092A2885AEC609376F182400828992034D79109374EC
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details