Birdwatch Note
2025-07-07 15:22:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN 1. Hier liegt keine Desinformation vor. 2. Es geht nicht um Suizid, sondern um selbstbestimmtes Sterben. Das hat das BVerfG ausdrücklich erlaubt, wenn keine psychische Störung vorliegt. ME/CFS ist keine psychische Störung. Hinweis auf Telefonseelsorge etc ist daher obsolet. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2025/01/rk20250131_2bvr129024.html?nn=68112
Written by 7C7F0AF0755BEFD8C4AE0259B1B8BA0B68CBFA2AE360CD8FE6E30C5728864AFE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1941445869754253664
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1942242836436353112
- noteId - 1942242836436353112
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7C7F0AF0755BEFD8C4AE0259B1B8BA0B68CBFA2AE360CD8FE6E30C5728864AFE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1751901751991
- tweetId - 1941445869754253664
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN 1. Hier liegt keine Desinformation vor. 2. Es geht nicht um Suizid, sondern um selbstbestimmtes Sterben. Das hat das BVerfG ausdrücklich erlaubt, wenn keine psychische Störung vorliegt. ME/CFS ist keine psychische Störung. Hinweis auf Telefonseelsorge etc ist daher obsolet. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2025/01/rk20250131_2bvr129024.html?nn=68112
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-07-07 10:34:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-07 10:28:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-07 11:03:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-07 15:08:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-07 21:13:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-07 15:25:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 09:14:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 08:33:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 00:15:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 17:50:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 10:31:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 15:59:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 02:29:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 19:21:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 14:52:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 20:01:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 09:58:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 05:26:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 14:31:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 11:25:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 04:55:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 04:15:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 15:34:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 14:22:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 13:18:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 07:39:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 03:34:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 11:02:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 21:02:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-08 00:14:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-09 23:36:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-10 16:05:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-10 01:25:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-10 07:01:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-13 08:30:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-14 16:49:06 -0500 | Rating Details |