Birdwatch Note
2025-05-17 02:37:41 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
“To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given…and we grant temporary injunctive relief to preserve our jurisdiction while the question… is adjudicated We… do not address the underlying merits regarding the legality of removals” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_g2bh.pdf
Written by D70CC5ABBE0DC8A940241D4517B4425A1B63C7A48A3C3414B2566FF2F1B9FDB7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1923496420956369350
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1923568574725259559
- noteId - 1923568574725259559
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D70CC5ABBE0DC8A940241D4517B4425A1B63C7A48A3C3414B2566FF2F1B9FDB7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1747449461047
- tweetId - 1923496420956369350
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- “To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given…and we grant temporary injunctive relief to preserve our jurisdiction while the question… is adjudicated We… do not address the underlying merits regarding the legality of removals” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_g2bh.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-05-17 10:47:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 02:20:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 23:54:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 23:08:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 04:57:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 22:19:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 21:31:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 07:25:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 02:57:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 02:35:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 22:21:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 08:19:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 17:36:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 12:11:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 00:19:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 23:21:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 01:41:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-19 14:34:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 15:13:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-16 22:25:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-17 06:52:26 -0500 | Rating Details |