Birdwatch Note
2025-02-15 13:43:39 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - To community note it properly you would need to show what percentage of DC are federal workers. If it's a high percentage (likely) then this could be roughly representative of the political leanings of of bureaucracy as the post implies.
Written by 9FE08EEB0D0B678D83FF96438EF64D104F16E6569ED01D9F25E9E91C70C3BDE2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1890421901085876365
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1890758878033240371
- noteId - 1890758878033240371
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9FE08EEB0D0B678D83FF96438EF64D104F16E6569ED01D9F25E9E91C70C3BDE2
- createdAtMillis - 1739627019782
- tweetId - 1890421901085876365
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - To community note it properly you would need to show what percentage of DC are federal workers. If it's a high percentage (likely) then this could be roughly representative of the political leanings of of bureaucracy as the post implies.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-16 17:46:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 16:39:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 01:51:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:53:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 15:33:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 15:23:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 13:23:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 12:28:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 12:17:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 10:45:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 10:19:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 10:07:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 09:27:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 08:12:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 08:11:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 07:50:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 09:18:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 05:15:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 13:25:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 08:34:50 -0600 | Rating Details |