Birdwatch Note
2025-01-31 17:49:18 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The article does not contradict the DeepSeek claim. It is an analysis piece. The $6 million claim misled many investors, leading to a single largest drop in Nvidia’s market capitalization. https://semianalysis.com/2025/01/31/deepseek-debates/
Written by 3DC16E43A78A66E4C7B3BA3444CE54727BA069B128C76FFFC34175026A908007
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885253685090930780
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885384880722182432
- noteId - 1885384880722182432
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3DC16E43A78A66E4C7B3BA3444CE54727BA069B128C76FFFC34175026A908007 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738345758979
- tweetId - 1885253685090930780
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The article does not contradict the DeepSeek claim. It is an analysis piece. The $6 million claim misled many investors, leading to a single largest drop in Nvidia’s market capitalization. https://semianalysis.com/2025/01/31/deepseek-debates/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-31 18:59:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 17:38:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 17:22:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 16:43:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 16:34:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 14:38:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 14:01:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 13:56:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 13:19:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 13:03:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 13:01:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 12:17:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 12:08:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 11:49:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 07:11:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 05:51:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:21:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:00:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:13:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 09:31:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 07:24:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 05:53:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:33:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:49:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 07:36:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:58:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 18:33:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 20:15:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 09:15:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 02:49:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 02:05:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 18:02:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 14:45:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 13:43:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 12:17:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 12:03:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-14 06:02:25 -0600 | Rating Details |