Birdwatch Note
2024-11-27 20:06:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A liminar requerida pelo autor da ação, que também é autor do post, foi denegada em 26/11/2024: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=1H000TF7Q0000&processo.foro=53&conversationId=&cbPesquisa=NMPARTE&dadosConsulta.valorConsulta=rhuan+batista&cdForo=-1&paginaConsulta=1
Written by 128A0E3AFF0132F6B02B68AD98A2FFE9CE9AF3BA8D44F0630ECC5E57DE1C1F23
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861119926033097156
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861864115800547823
- noteId - 1861864115800547823
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 128A0E3AFF0132F6B02B68AD98A2FFE9CE9AF3BA8D44F0630ECC5E57DE1C1F23
- createdAtMillis - 1732737971626
- tweetId - 1861119926033097156
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A liminar requerida pelo autor da ação, que também é autor do post, foi denegada em 26/11/2024: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=1H000TF7Q0000&processo.foro=53&conversationId=&cbPesquisa=NMPARTE&dadosConsulta.valorConsulta=rhuan+batista&cdForo=-1&paginaConsulta=1
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-27 21:11:52 -0600 | Rating Details |