Birdwatch Note
2024-11-11 22:15:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
James O'Keefe is not a party to this lawsuit. Project Veritas won this appeal, not James O’Keefe. O’Keefe also did not pay for this lawsuit - Project Veritas did. https://www.reuters.com/legal/cnn-must-face-project-veritas-defamation-lawsuit-us-appeals-court-rules-2024-11-07/ https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202211270.pdf
Written by B1B4654B2606FFB340BB423EF2BB9E8E93141F7FFEEE56379827AFDB4CD6F21F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856078823915450494
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856098510472675655
- noteId - 1856098510472675655
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B1B4654B2606FFB340BB423EF2BB9E8E93141F7FFEEE56379827AFDB4CD6F21F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731363344196
- tweetId - 1856078823915450494
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- James O'Keefe is not a party to this lawsuit. Project Veritas won this appeal, not James O’Keefe. O’Keefe also did not pay for this lawsuit - Project Veritas did. https://www.reuters.com/legal/cnn-must-face-project-veritas-defamation-lawsuit-us-appeals-court-rules-2024-11-07/ https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202211270.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-11 20:41:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:33:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:20:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:19:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:12:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 17:46:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 17:23:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:56:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:30:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:30:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:25:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:25:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:23:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:23:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-12 19:54:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 19:57:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:53:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:46:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 18:35:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 17:53:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 17:15:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:20:58 -0600 | Rating Details |