Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-27 17:15:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

While it’s unknown who was truly behind this stunt, 3M is often credited with it, not to be confused with $3 million. The actual amount of money inside was $500. Rather than bulletproof glass, a shatter resistant film was placed over the box. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/3m-marketing-scheme/

Written by C34C912022215593401E145678BDBC0FF64D63128CC43F5FBBF3988D0EC28A73
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1850587160614953199
• noteId - 1850587160614953199
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - C34C912022215593401E145678BDBC0FF64D63128CC43F5FBBF3988D0EC28A73
• createdAtMillis - 1730049335994
• tweetId - 1850515327316095424
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• While it’s unknown who was truly behind this stunt, 3M is often credited with it, not to be confused with $3 million. The actual amount of money inside was $500. Rather than bulletproof glass, a shatter resistant film was placed over the box. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/3m-marketing-scheme/