Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-26 16:22:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. What on earth does the proposed note have to do with the original post? Possibly the worst attempted Community Note I've seen. And the IDF don't qualify as a trusted source.

Written by 1790BDFFFCE3912F7DD1F7C819651A79722464FB03A7767065CA6C13C0DB4D96
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1850084014113075541

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1850211378910646671
  • noteId - 1850211378910646671
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1790BDFFFCE3912F7DD1F7C819651A79722464FB03A7767065CA6C13C0DB4D96 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729959742655
  • tweetId - 1850084014113075541
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. What on earth does the proposed note have to do with the original post? Possibly the worst attempted Community Note I've seen. And the IDF don't qualify as a trusted source.