Birdwatch Note
2024-10-21 19:01:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
After much review, the evidence is unclear. It’s not readily discernible which videos are authentic to either point.
Written by 69805991C6A1537B117D181127ABDAFE4E2FC73D110E230786D556B9F28F69F9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847359119600263314
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848439584369340784
- noteId - 1848439584369340784
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 69805991C6A1537B117D181127ABDAFE4E2FC73D110E230786D556B9F28F69F9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729537313917
- tweetId - 1847359119600263314
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- After much review, the evidence is unclear. It’s not readily discernible which videos are authentic to either point.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-21 15:16:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 14:47:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 21:17:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 14:51:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 00:30:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 17:17:46 -0500 | Rating Details |