Birdwatch Note
2024-10-13 01:31:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. They corrected themselves in a follow-up post but adding a CN to speculation fueled by a leak where none of this information is confirmed = not necessary
Written by 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845199794966495348
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1845276184633860145
- noteId - 1845276184633860145
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728783100647
- tweetId - 1845199794966495348
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. They corrected themselves in a follow-up post but adding a CN to speculation fueled by a leak where none of this information is confirmed = not necessary
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-13 08:28:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-13 03:37:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-12 20:41:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-13 01:38:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-12 23:33:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-12 20:42:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-13 13:54:25 -0500 | Rating Details |