Birdwatch Note
2024-09-20 05:52:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Crits-Christoph et al. 2024 has unsound premises, has unsound conclusions, and may be a product of scientific misconduct. https://biosafetynow.substack.com/p/crits-christoph-et-al-2024-retraction
Written by 279270BDEEBBF50DBF5F556CBF8E4C6C4E44D9E64FD523FBFC829152BCA0CFE4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1836938216714440771
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837006917161353338
- noteId - 1837006917161353338
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 279270BDEEBBF50DBF5F556CBF8E4C6C4E44D9E64FD523FBFC829152BCA0CFE4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1726811553645
- tweetId - 1836938216714440771
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Crits-Christoph et al. 2024 has unsound premises, has unsound conclusions, and may be a product of scientific misconduct. https://biosafetynow.substack.com/p/crits-christoph-et-al-2024-retraction
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-20 15:44:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-20 10:40:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-20 01:46:15 -0500 | Rating Details |