Birdwatch Note
2024-08-08 10:38:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
That isn’t Meghan Markle; it is Alexandra Escat. Many articles were published at the time. The OP is spreading misinformation. https://t.co/M6JK9LjDIe
Written by 072ED9BA50E2AD6C5F38B160475BC6B58281E346F7E64AC99137834A86ECBBF8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821053254580494822
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821496254553374928
- noteId - 1821496254553374928
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 072ED9BA50E2AD6C5F38B160475BC6B58281E346F7E64AC99137834A86ECBBF8
- createdAtMillis - 1723113523507
- tweetId - 1821053254580494822
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- That isn’t Meghan Markle; it is Alexandra Escat. Many articles were published at the time. The OP is spreading misinformation. https://t.co/M6JK9LjDIe
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 19:05:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 18:47:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 14:16:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 05:53:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 05:52:19 -0500 | Rating Details |