Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-31 14:46:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - lots of different CN's battling to give context to this tweet which does not need a CN by virtue of it being an opinion.

Written by 29F6E793EC7D173001CF4790F22F85198A9BD8FECA2F08D6036AC31DDAD7F3B5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818390536195080499

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818659526943334848
  • noteId - 1818659526943334848
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 29F6E793EC7D173001CF4790F22F85198A9BD8FECA2F08D6036AC31DDAD7F3B5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722437194942
  • tweetId - 1818390536195080499
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - lots of different CN's battling to give context to this tweet which does not need a CN by virtue of it being an opinion.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 12:56:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 09:55:20 -0500 Rating Details