Birdwatch Note
2024-07-14 11:34:10 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The referred "estimate" was not by the Lancet but made in a letter to the editor. Also the number of 186k is made as a hypothetical possible future number of victims attributable to the conflict. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext
Written by D493CC33B4419D6A9D712531CF09FF88C0C68AE6E981E687D6EA8DAF7572043F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812441344171725162
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812450512597372961
- noteId - 1812450512597372961
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D493CC33B4419D6A9D712531CF09FF88C0C68AE6E981E687D6EA8DAF7572043F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1720956850562
- tweetId - 1812441344171725162
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The referred "estimate" was not by the Lancet but made in a letter to the editor. Also the number of 186k is made as a hypothetical possible future number of victims attributable to the conflict. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext