Birdwatch Note
2024-03-20 15:29:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is factually incorrect according to the congressional web here: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt8-1/ALDE_00000258/ "...but the Supreme Court has held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines can apply in civil forfeiture proceedings, noting that the text of the amendment is not limited to criminal cases.6"
Written by 271BF4ADED77210294AED28ECBEEF68E5A37B633744BF7A8AC147E213B90D032
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1770447328169652555
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1770472822348890276
- noteId - 1770472822348890276
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 271BF4ADED77210294AED28ECBEEF68E5A37B633744BF7A8AC147E213B90D032 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1710948589300
- tweetId - 1770447328169652555
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is factually incorrect according to the congressional web here: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt8-1/ALDE_00000258/ "...but the Supreme Court has held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines can apply in civil forfeiture proceedings, noting that the text of the amendment is not limited to criminal cases.6"
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-03-20 15:29:49 UTC (1710948589300) |
2024-03-20 18:45:41 UTC (1710960341247) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-03-21 01:30:52 UTC (1710984652589) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-03-20 18:45:41 UTC (1710960341247) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-03-20 10:58:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-20 10:51:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-21 07:41:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-20 13:43:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-21 10:42:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-20 12:23:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-20 11:59:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-20 10:40:14 -0500 | Rating Details |