Birdwatch Note
2023-11-25 15:13:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
La vida útil promedio de un actor porno no es de 36 años (como un artículo científico lo indica) mucho menos es de un año solamente. Discusión al respecto: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/28081/is-the-average-life-expectancy-of-a-pornographic-actor-significantly-lower-than#:~:text=The%20Pink%20Cross%20Foundation%2C%20an,sure%20these%20numbers%20are%20trustworthy.
Written by 1ACEEE9C06FBDDEB0EAD28EE8D0B0B42F62340DF9A07825087F18DFB1560D82B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1728384375832654005
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1728431699489395162
- noteId - 1728431699489395162
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1ACEEE9C06FBDDEB0EAD28EE8D0B0B42F62340DF9A07825087F18DFB1560D82B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700925204523
- tweetId - 1728384375832654005
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- La vida útil promedio de un actor porno no es de 36 años (como un artículo científico lo indica) mucho menos es de un año solamente. Discusión al respecto: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/28081/is-the-average-life-expectancy-of-a-pornographic-actor-significantly-lower-than#:~:text=The%20Pink%20Cross%20Foundation%2C%20an,sure%20these%20numbers%20are%20trustworthy.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-25 15:13:24 UTC (1700925204523) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-26 03:30:36 UTC (1700969436505) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-25 18:15:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 17:45:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 13:07:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 11:22:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 10:04:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:58:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:57:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:34:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 10:09:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-26 15:43:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 16:35:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:58:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:56:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:43:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-23 21:43:18 -0600 | Rating Details |