Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-22 20:55:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - Post is opinion based on abductive reasoning. Science requires observable, repeatable results in accordance with scientific method. Impossible with “climate change.” Regardless of consensus, abductive reasoning, in either direction, re: climate change, is valid. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/intro-to-biology/science-of-biology/a/the-science-of-biology https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/deduction-vs-induction-vs-abduction

Written by 965E5FBA7B98499CF6B0869ED349ACE095BEF2CC95DAC24857EE8599CF59B731
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1727102582668300579

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1727430592071909385
  • noteId - 1727430592071909385
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 965E5FBA7B98499CF6B0869ED349ACE095BEF2CC95DAC24857EE8599CF59B731 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700686521915
  • tweetId - 1727102582668300579
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - Post is opinion based on abductive reasoning. Science requires observable, repeatable results in accordance with scientific method. Impossible with “climate change.” Regardless of consensus, abductive reasoning, in either direction, re: climate change, is valid. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/intro-to-biology/science-of-biology/a/the-science-of-biology https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/deduction-vs-induction-vs-abduction

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-22 20:55:21 UTC
(1700686521915)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-23 04:34:16 UTC
(1700714056905)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-22 15:21:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:04:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:01:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 14:57:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-23 06:48:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 18:31:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:26:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:19:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:16:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 15:15:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 14:58:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 14:58:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-22 14:55:55 -0600 Rating Details