Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-15 18:12:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

O internauta se equivocou ao dizer que "só aprovar tudo" para rankear como moderador de notas. É preciso avaliar as notas com cuidado, para não cometer erros. Aprovar notas que não atendam aos padrões de qualidade pode resultar na perda de pontos e prejudicar o ranking. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/about/introduction https://oglobo.globo.com/politica/noticia/2023/11/12/checagem-coletiva-no-antigo-twitter-permite-uso-politico-e-desafia-tse-nas-eleicoes-de-2024.ghtml

Written by 93EB5E1BF8221D289F0BB08B3C4EC3D780903103D1367D397E6FBA2FEFB09924
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724802417609564639

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724852965129736688
  • noteId - 1724852965129736688
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 93EB5E1BF8221D289F0BB08B3C4EC3D780903103D1367D397E6FBA2FEFB09924 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700071967762
  • tweetId - 1724802417609564639
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • O internauta se equivocou ao dizer que "só aprovar tudo" para rankear como moderador de notas. É preciso avaliar as notas com cuidado, para não cometer erros. Aprovar notas que não atendam aos padrões de qualidade pode resultar na perda de pontos e prejudicar o ranking. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/about/introduction https://oglobo.globo.com/politica/noticia/2023/11/12/checagem-coletiva-no-antigo-twitter-permite-uso-politico-e-desafia-tse-nas-eleicoes-de-2024.ghtml

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-15 18:12:47 UTC
(1700071967762)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC
(1700104087450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-15 13:29:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:37:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 17:34:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 15:31:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 15:08:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 21:55:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 21:43:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 20:25:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 18:05:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 05:48:35 -0600 Rating Details