Birdwatch Note
2023-11-03 23:21:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Smolting is in fact a frog. Why would it be green and unlikeable if it wasn‘t? The link to the froks profile: https://twitter.com/inversebrah
Written by 62783981694F27D65C20F2A8664DDD801482ED0085A4F56EE6C9142CC16C6AE3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720573649961513142
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720582021418725424
- noteId - 1720582021418725424
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 62783981694F27D65C20F2A8664DDD801482ED0085A4F56EE6C9142CC16C6AE3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699053695432
- tweetId - 1720573649961513142
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Smolting is in fact a frog. Why would it be green and unlikeable if it wasn‘t? The link to the froks profile: https://twitter.com/inversebrah
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-03 23:21:35 UTC (1699053695432) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC (1699067056450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-03 20:03:18 -0500 | Rating Details |