Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 23:29:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Neither of the links I. The proposed note state what the note claims they do. One of them actually supports the post (https://t.co/uNfZWOt0U4) insofar as making the claim of 26 cases. It also goes on to say LSK is investigating. In neither article is their any claim regarding the number of cases.

Written by 2875F939ECE717C3F1CB561685CB1A292B2AAF0D25051E9938FFA52C5796FA6D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712567220927377679

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712973855457788241
  • noteId - 1712973855457788241
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2875F939ECE717C3F1CB561685CB1A292B2AAF0D25051E9938FFA52C5796FA6D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697239767315
  • tweetId - 1712567220927377679
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Neither of the links I. The proposed note state what the note claims they do. One of them actually supports the post (https://t.co/uNfZWOt0U4) insofar as making the claim of 26 cases. It also goes on to say LSK is investigating. In neither article is their any claim regarding the number of cases.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 23:29:27 UTC
(1697239767315)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-15 04:03:20 UTC
(1697342600019)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 19:57:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 19:46:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 19:43:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 19:34:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 19:11:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 19:08:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 18:48:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 18:36:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 17:48:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 15:56:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 15:25:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 12:12:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 12:04:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 11:29:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 11:26:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 10:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 10:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 08:56:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 08:29:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 07:13:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 05:39:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 05:06:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 04:58:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 02:52:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 02:31:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 01:24:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 00:15:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 00:03:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 23:53:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 21:30:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 21:23:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 20:47:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 00:44:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 20:22:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:22:32 -0500 Rating Details