Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-06 11:52:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The article cites two independent named sources, Ledgerwood and Sager. It also provides a recording and notes disavowals by convoy related groups due to plans for violence. PressProgress has no failed fact checks in the last five years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/press-progress/ Sufficient basis for allegation; NNN.

Written by 9692357929540D5E7A923D6ABA7F8E2FB4E51D5FBAEE8D584B35B667111BFAB1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710074199782416576

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1710261651113447732
  • noteId - 1710261651113447732
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9692357929540D5E7A923D6ABA7F8E2FB4E51D5FBAEE8D584B35B667111BFAB1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696593127412
  • tweetId - 1710074199782416576
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The article cites two independent named sources, Ledgerwood and Sager. It also provides a recording and notes disavowals by convoy related groups due to plans for violence. PressProgress has no failed fact checks in the last five years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/press-progress/ Sufficient basis for allegation; NNN.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-06 11:52:07 UTC
(1696593127412)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-07 02:42:31 UTC
(1696646551297)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-06 19:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 16:30:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 16:16:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 15:23:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 13:48:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 10:53:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 10:35:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 10:12:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 09:55:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 09:27:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 08:53:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 08:16:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 07:22:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 07:17:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 07:03:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 19:46:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 12:55:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 05:45:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 16:27:08 -0500 Rating Details