Birdwatch Note
2023-08-11 00:41:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This tweet has nothing to do with eugenics. This tweet is asking for their readers' favourite families or dynasties from history. The author of this tweet however, is trying to frame it so as to suggest @historyinmemes is talking the practice of genetical selection. https://www.britannica.com/science/eugenics-genetics
Written by 76B8B0EBF9AAC935047A60F656728913278ECE0A2224D273850CECA46A1F86D7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1689750519311482880
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1689799128522297578
- noteId - 1689799128522297578
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 76B8B0EBF9AAC935047A60F656728913278ECE0A2224D273850CECA46A1F86D7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691714481853
- tweetId - 1689750519311482880
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This tweet has nothing to do with eugenics. This tweet is asking for their readers' favourite families or dynasties from history. The author of this tweet however, is trying to frame it so as to suggest @historyinmemes is talking the practice of genetical selection. https://www.britannica.com/science/eugenics-genetics
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-11 00:41:21 UTC (1691714481853) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-11 02:40:29 UTC (1691721629206) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-11 13:11:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 12:40:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 12:30:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 11:57:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 10:19:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 10:11:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 09:57:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 09:54:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 09:18:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 08:36:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 07:10:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 06:20:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 06:02:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 05:41:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 04:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 04:30:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 02:22:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 02:12:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 02:05:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 02:03:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 22:53:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 21:51:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 21:36:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 21:23:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 21:17:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 21:11:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 20:14:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 20:00:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 19:48:33 -0500 | Rating Details |