Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-28 23:38:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Despite the headline, the article itself specifies that SpaceX themselves could decide if they needed a permit or not: “The determination of whether a discharge permit is needed is the responsibility of the business owner based on how they plan to manage wastewater,”

Written by FBC0C8FC6FAF47F1F32D2818113D411E6AB73F469A318E0C18F9E4DFCF851979
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1685022011578314757

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1685072181401649152
  • noteId - 1685072181401649152
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FBC0C8FC6FAF47F1F32D2818113D411E6AB73F469A318E0C18F9E4DFCF851979 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690587489831
  • tweetId - 1685022011578314757
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Despite the headline, the article itself specifies that SpaceX themselves could decide if they needed a permit or not: “The determination of whether a discharge permit is needed is the responsibility of the business owner based on how they plan to manage wastewater,”

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-28 23:38:09 UTC
(1690587489831)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-29 02:10:10 UTC
(1690596610739)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-28 19:27:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 19:18:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 19:18:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 18:40:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 17:59:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 16:51:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 16:10:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 14:47:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 12:54:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 12:08:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 10:26:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 10:19:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 09:59:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 09:18:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:56:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:35:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:33:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 06:27:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 05:22:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 05:03:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 04:55:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 04:37:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 04:16:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 03:48:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 03:10:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 02:18:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 01:09:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 00:29:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 23:24:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 23:22:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 23:11:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 22:25:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 20:45:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 20:38:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 20:04:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 19:44:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 08:48:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:04:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-12 16:01:20 -0500 Rating Details