Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-27 03:04:05 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

She was renowned for high expectations from "EMPLOYEES" & bank was under her direction. "She held her employees to a high standard. She was pushing NatWest to achieve higher standards" https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66256912 Banking industry leaders feel her actions are a serious set back for NatWest.

Written by 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1684079400034222080

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1684399229278605312
  • noteId - 1684399229278605312
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690427045543
  • tweetId - 1684079400034222080
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • She was renowned for high expectations from "EMPLOYEES" & bank was under her direction. "She held her employees to a high standard. She was pushing NatWest to achieve higher standards" https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66256912 Banking industry leaders feel her actions are a serious set back for NatWest.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-27 03:04:05 UTC
(1690427045543)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-28 02:13:08 UTC
(1690510388150)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-27 03:55:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 03:40:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 03:24:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 02:47:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 02:18:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 00:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 23:40:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 22:17:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 22:09:08 -0500 Rating Details