Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-14 20:22:56 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

One would think the recommended note should be placed as a reply to author of tweet. As Community Notes contributors, we should be cautious about playing police on tweets. The author of the post simply stated “Gulp” and left it to Twitter users to decide if fake or not. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en

Written by E13721D06789B0E6FAF7E9EDA2FED8A7725E4CBDAB0C8C15C787F25DE8F7ADFD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1679566361985716224

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1679949622133809152
  • noteId - 1679949622133809152
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E13721D06789B0E6FAF7E9EDA2FED8A7725E4CBDAB0C8C15C787F25DE8F7ADFD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689366176527
  • tweetId - 1679566361985716224
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • One would think the recommended note should be placed as a reply to author of tweet. As Community Notes contributors, we should be cautious about playing police on tweets. The author of the post simply stated “Gulp” and left it to Twitter users to decide if fake or not. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-14 20:22:56 UTC
(1689366176527)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-15 05:11:15 UTC
(1689397875149)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-14 17:14:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:59:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:09:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:08:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:06:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:05:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:58:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:47:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:34:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:32:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:31:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:31:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:31:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:28:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:26:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:23:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 09:45:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 08:12:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-20 16:04:31 -0500 Rating Details