Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-04 03:24:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This alleged request from "Stewart" was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion because it had no bearing on the outcome of the case. The issue of the plaintiff's legal standing was not in dispute in this case, which is why the dissent doesn't mention it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

Written by 58C70D2D877142FB9593551D3C482517586B35635FD65DAED0753A1C813F523C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675557460172496896

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1676069505724981248
  • noteId - 1676069505724981248
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 58C70D2D877142FB9593551D3C482517586B35635FD65DAED0753A1C813F523C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688441084688
  • tweetId - 1675557460172496896
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This alleged request from "Stewart" was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion because it had no bearing on the outcome of the case. The issue of the plaintiff's legal standing was not in dispute in this case, which is why the dissent doesn't mention it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-04 03:24:44 UTC
(1688441084688)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-05 02:12:43 UTC
(1688523163429)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-04 10:30:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 10:14:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 05:04:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 00:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 00:19:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 22:30:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 22:27:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 22:25:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:45:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 12:23:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 12:06:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 11:56:30 -0500 Rating Details