Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-01-10 02:40:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no scientific evidence for earthquake predictions. There is always a chance for earthquakes in places like Indonesia, but specific predictions perform no better than random when tested. More from scientists: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-we-predict-earthquakes-at-all1/ User's history of pseudoscience claims: https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.inverse.com/science/earthquake-prediction-dutchsinse-holmquist-conspiracy

Written by 114D3959B7A1FAF013A9773725D3AC9653F490590C8B76CB7CE232B010DE900E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1612634320174477313

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1612640563911856128
  • noteId - 1612640563911856128
  • participantId - 114D3959B7A1FAF013A9773725D3AC9653F490590C8B76CB7CE232B010DE900E
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1673318446506
  • tweetId - 1612634320174477313
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no scientific evidence for earthquake predictions. There is always a chance for earthquakes in places like Indonesia, but specific predictions perform no better than random when tested. More from scientists: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-we-predict-earthquakes-at-all1/ User's history of pseudoscience claims: https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.inverse.com/science/earthquake-prediction-dutchsinse-holmquist-conspiracy

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-01-10 07:28:19 -0600 2A4A5D0229E7E2819DA05D19559BF10EB1E20EC834064EB8633FD77F018CAED7 Rating Details
2023-01-10 00:59:42 -0600 2A836FABCCF0EE6EDFD7AD9F50AC054C030FCB9D215F09D984494EDBB10BF074 Rating Details
2023-01-13 09:27:31 -0600 3440E327FFC09396E77E3C806B2CE63500A27905ABDA4DA599C2EFB3935307B4 Rating Details
2023-01-10 06:46:01 -0600 39DBF1CC7F85DF403E9C5D847B2CC7E8D743AD5CA7CEAE60B2EC1F21E22E7380 Rating Details
2023-01-09 22:17:44 -0600 4302ABC07DA193A79D3A57D2E3B24B34208EDD84A6A4ED0926553626742493A8 Rating Details
2023-01-10 08:03:31 -0600 479D7C5F98493FD6FCBEB2062CB7B6D9A7D4E9590B9B724B92E0C68020F732D4 Rating Details
2023-01-10 12:17:48 -0600 658CE2A645DD2DC9B93428181F7676D836B6C92E8A04D6335670F66A5D1ED740 Rating Details
2023-01-10 17:54:05 -0600 686743A2617FB6D7D24943FB77BB5CE97033AD0B645DD863659CAF5473611E8E Rating Details
2023-01-10 02:29:06 -0600 7D5B3697DEECBDCCD06020B8210098DCD2EE515B4B42CBE9678A253A897C6063 Rating Details
2023-01-10 08:15:48 -0600 A85F927C9E2230CA97A16F2D42A0863AE8F865C26076FFD7493E49F75D5CC756 Rating Details
2023-01-10 14:14:32 -0600 AA666C86270B66AFD57DA5384BEA3E6506A9771CE51322EF624604E00E0CA72B Rating Details
2023-01-10 11:10:16 -0600 B51C4FC3A5DE22EBD20FFC382BB9915DF16B06915699D37F5D3FF21845364884 Rating Details
2023-01-10 14:14:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 08:15:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 08:03:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 06:46:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 11:10:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 12:17:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 02:29:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-09 22:17:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-13 09:27:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 07:28:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 00:59:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-01-10 17:54:05 -0600 Rating Details